Redington Sonic-Pro Wader – Men’s

We’ve read the reviews across the web for the Redington Sonic-Pro Wader – Men’s and summarize the results below:

Universal Ranking

PeakScore: 86 (out of 100)
User Rating: 4.3 stars 
Expert Rating: 4.2 stars

Number of Ratings Reviewed: 23

Pros & Cons

Reasons to buy:

User Reviews

  • Accessible storage pockets.
  • Comfortable to wear.
  • Provides adequate mobility.
  • Front pouch is good for easy storage.

Expert Reviews

  • The seams are welded and taped, instead of being sewed, allowing for security.
  • Four-times layered nyon provides durability and breathability.
  • When they are packed tight, they can take up little space in a bag.
  • Provide adequate insulation in colder temperatures, while wearing a thermal underneath.
  • The flexible belt is easier to adjust.
  • The anglers are ergonomically-built for an efficient design.
  • The zippered front portion is waterproof.
  • Features a tool dock on the left chest area for materials.
  • The right pocket can fit a fly box, and two fleece-lined hand pockets provide warmth.
  • Mesh pocket with key attachment for easy access.
  • The metal parts on the waders are durable and long-lasting.
  • The gravel guards feature lace-hooks for durability and a comfortable fit.

Reasons NOT to buy:

User Reviews

  • Overall fit is ‘slim’, yet the feet area is too big in relation to the overall size.
  • Reports of leaking after use.
  • The tape can pull away from the seams at about shin-height after use.

Expert Reviews

  • Expensive.
  • The wading belt is thin nylon, so may not be as durable.
  • The flexibility may not be suitable in the knee and groin area.
  • People who need a long inseam may struggle finding the correct fit.

Summary:

The Redington Sonic-Pro Wader for men is a great choice for fishermen needing a functional, warm, comfortable, and durable wader. The multitude of pockets and technical specs make this a good choice for any serious fisherman out on the water.

Multimedia:

Note: User and expert rankings were reviewed across the web, including here: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.