SRAM XG-1295 X01 Eagle 12-Speed Cassette

We’ve read the reviews across the web for the SRAM XG-1295 X01 Eagle 12-Speed Cassette and summarize the results below:

Universal Ranking

PeakScore: 95 (out of 100)
User Rating: 4.9 stars 
Expert Rating: 4.5 stars

Number of Ratings Reviewed: 44

Pros & Cons

Reasons to buy:

User Reviews

  • Reports of shifting well and easily.
  • Provides very smooth running.
  • The 50-tooth gear is crucial on steep inclines.
  • Lighter than the GX model.
  • Gives you the opportunity to climb very steep terrain a bit easier.
  • High reliability on this product.
  • The 12 speed aids in long climbs.
  • Allows the rider to move up to the first chain-ring, providing a fast downhill ride.

Expert Reviews

  • No reports of having to re-tune or reliability issues.
  • The downshift levers have a lever angle that can be adjusted, and allows you to hook up five gears, aiding in the rider being able to pedal easier.
  • The foam core in the crank arms allows them to be resistant to damage.
  • The 10-50T provides ample gear range.
  • The 42 and 50T cogs allow for ideal synchronization due to narrow tooth design.
  • The variety and spread gives the rider an option to use a larger chain-ring to achieve a higher top speed, while still maintaining an easy pedaling ratio.
  • The spreads utilize three teeth and chain rollers together, preventing over-torquing on one tooth.
  • The base has been remodeled to better rid of mud and grit.
  • The smooth material of the shoulders allows for smoother shifting, increasing the lifespan of the entire gear set.
  • Pins look nicer and more high-quality than those on the GX.

Reasons NOT to buy:

User Reviews

  • Expensive.

Expert Reviews

  • High-quality, but expensive option.


The SRAM XG-1295 X01 Eagle 12-Speed Cassette is a highly functional, durable, reliable, and efficient cassette that is a top choice for serious cyclists interested in an increased gear range, pedaling maximization, and smooth transitions. The only downside? Its high cost.


Note: User and expert rankings were reviewed across the web, including here: 1, 2, 3.